Roman Britain

This picture shows a great difference between Roman Britain and Celtic Britain. Can you tell me any other thing that was also different?

About j62011

Junior 6 Blog
This entry was posted in History and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Roman Britain

  1. Cande Vargas says:

    The Celts were more primitive.
    The Romans had baths.
    The Celts lived in huts.
    The Romans built main roads.
    The Celts Didn´t had writing system.
    The Romans had vilages.

    Cande!

  2. felipe says:

    The Romans were more original and modern than the Celts.They had villages, houses and the gladiators had an armour, swords, daggers, helmets and shields.

  3. mateo says:

    They were very different.The Celts were less modern than the Romans.The Romans had housses with mirrors,roses,estatues and columns and Celts have only cabe.The Romans had best armour than the Celts but the Celts had horses.

  4. toti says:

    As usually the romans were more technologists than the celts and they had a lot of things better than the celts like central heating in the houses, baths and villages.

  5. Mara says:

    The Celts had horses and the Romans no.
    The Celts were more primitive than the Romans.
    The Celts lived in huts and the Romans in houses.
    The Romans had villages and the Celts no.
    The Romans had writting sistem and the Celts no.

  6. Camila Barletta says:

    The Celts were more primitive than the Romans.
    The Celts had horses and the Romans no.
    The Romans had central heatting and the Celts no.
    The Romans had roads and the Celts no.
    The Celts live in a hut (the whole large families live there)
    The Romans had baths ,they were used for having a hot bath.

  7. santi says:

    The Celts haven”t got roads
    The Romans had central heating
    The Celts were more primitive
    The Romans had a writting sistem

  8. lucila giambruni says:

    -The Romans had baths.
    -The Celts lived in huts.
    -The Romans had a writing system.
    -The Celts were fierce warriors.
    -The Romans were cleaner and helthier.
    -The Celts were not so clean.

  9. Luna says:

    The Romans had central heating. They were more primitive.
    The romans had fun with baths and fights at the coliseum.
    The Celts didn´t have a writing system and they didn´t have too much armor. So in the battles they could move easily.
    Luna

  10. luki says:

    Yes, that the romans had great houses with a lot of adornments but the celts live in houses of mud and straw

  11. Tomy A says:

    The Celts didn’t have one governor,they had chief.
    Celts didn’t have amphitheatre.
    Celts didn’t have main roads.
    Romans had an emperor.
    Romans had the most luxurious houses with central heating.
    Romans had a diciplined army.

  12. pancho says:

    The Romans were more advanced than the Celts because:
    The Romas had streets but the Celts not.
    The Romas had baths and the Celts rivers.
    The Romans had armours and the celts no. They did have armour, but more primitive ones.

  13. catu says:

    the romans had a lot of thight that tha celts didnt had like
    the romans had bashroom and the celt had a river
    the romans like to be very clin and the cels werent.

  14. Flor Araya says:

    The Romans had roads and the Celts didn’t.
    The Romans had a writing system and the Celts didn’t.
    The Romans were more advanced than the Celts.
    The Romans were cleaner than the Celts.
    And the Romans had a very well disiplined army.

  15. Rochi :) says:

    The Romans were more advanced than the Celts and they had better builders. The Romans were cleaner and they had baths in mostly every city (or land) they owned. The Romans also had more entertainment than the Celts because they had anphitheatres!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *